A. Ito
To Win
E. Shibahara
To Win
Sara Saito vs Ena Shibahara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W L W L W L L
Form
L W L W L W L W W WHead-2-Head: Saito 3 - 0 Shibahara
They have played 7 sets in total, with Saito winning 6 and Shibahara winning 1. The last match between Saito and Shibahara was at the W50 Kofu, 27-03-2024, First, Hard with Sara Saito getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sara Saito | 3 |
| Ena Shibahara | 0 |
W50 Kofu(27-03-2024)
6
2
6
2
| Saito | Stats | Shibahara |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (14-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 55% (11-9) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 165 | Ranking | 139 |
| 150 | Highest Rank | 132 |
| 18 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 1 |
| 64% (91-52) | Career Total W/L | 59% (148-102) |
| $12,193 | Career Prize Money | $205,348 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 3 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Semifinals
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Baez VS Dzumhur PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Sara Saito
Player
Ena Shibahara
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
||||
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Ena Shibahara
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 4-6 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Ena Shibahara
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 41 | Games Won | 23 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:31:40 | Average Match Time | 1:31:40 |
| 71% (133/187) | 1st Serve % | 61% (114/186) |
| 74% (99/133) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (70/114) |
| 54% (29/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (34/72) |
| 57% (12/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (4/12) |
| 44% (82/186) | Return Points Win % | 32% (59/187) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sara Saito Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sohyun Park
Player
Sara Saito
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Sara Saito
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Jesika Maleckova
51%
(
53 of
103)
1st Serve %
45%
(
39 of
86)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
31 of
39)
46%
(
23 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Sara Saito
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
22 of
45)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
2
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
48 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caroline Werner
Player
Sara Saito
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
51%
(
47 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
68%
(
83 of
122)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
2
Aces
0
11
Double Faults
7
52%
(
43 of
83)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
63 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
54 of
100)
113
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Sara Saito
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
9
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Sohyun Park
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
61 of
79)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Momoko Kobori
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ena Shibahara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Maddison Inglis
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Emerson Jones
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
71 of
112)
11
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
61%
(
22 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
84
|
6-7(7) 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Ena Koike
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Ena Shibahara
63%
(
68 of
108)
1st Serve %
103%
(
61 of
59)
14
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
54 of
88)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
56 of
138)
128
Total Points Won
118
|
6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
95%
(
76 of
80)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
86%
(
19 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaqueline Cristian
Player
Ena Shibahara
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
41 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
22 of
68)
82
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Hanna Chang
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Ena Shibahara
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
4
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
34 of
67)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
22 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Ena Shibahara
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (91/52) | Win/Loss | 59% (148/102) |
| 60% (194/131) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (330/249) |
| 54% (1603/1361) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (2835/2485) |
| 58% (46/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (108/75) |
| 65% (17/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (11/11) |
| 76% (25/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (24/11) |
| 75% (3/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 159 | Aces Total | 608 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 405 | Total Double Faults | 610 |
| 1:32:25 | Average Match Time | 1:23:59 |
| 356.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 411.45 |
| 67% (6148/9185) | 1st Serve % | 62% (8744/14006) |
| 61% (3764/6148) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (5641/8724) |
| 47% (1425/3037) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2572/5338) |
| 49% (599/1225) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (737/1631) |
| 47% (4369/9293) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6210/14155) |
| 40% (2/3) | Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 40% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 44% (19/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (84/41) | Challenger W/L | 63% (119/71) |
| 33% (1/2) | Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (87/139) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (145/245) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (13/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (32/55) |
| 61% (25/41) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (47/84) |
| 90% (83/75) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (147/127) |
| 10% (83/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (147/19) |
| 24% (58/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (103/20) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
